Golden Nugget Letter From The CEO Official Playoff Party VIP Weekend Giveaway
Marketing
IMPORTANT: This is not a gaming site. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
 

 

Time to Enter the Benton Zone

 

+359 DIMES LAST 89 DAYS

 

If you had bet just $1 per dime released,

you would have won $3,590 in the Benton Zone!

 


 

TALE OF THE TAPE

 

38-24-2 Last 39 Days (+272 Dimes)

 

24-16 Last 27 Days (+136.5 Dimes)

 

24 of last 40 days on the plus side

 


 

MONDAY'S ACTION

 

15 DIME

HORIZON LEAGUE

GAME OF THE YEAR

 

Loyola-Chicago vs. Butler

 

10-3 run with 15 Dime plays (all sports)

 

42-33-1 run with 15 Dime plays (College Hoops only)

 


 

#1 COLLEGE HOOPS 'CAPPER AT THIS SITE

SINCE 2007-08 SEASON!!

 


 

Sunday's Recap

 

60 Dime: Colts over Saints - Loser

Net Result: -66 Dimes

 


 

4-0 BCS BOWL GAME SWEEP

 

30 Dime: Florida over Cincinnati

20 Dime: Boise State over TCU

20 Dime: Iowa-Georgia Tech UNDER

40 Dime: Alabama over Texas

 

+110 Dimes in the biggest College Football games of the season!

 


 

NFL SCORECARD

 

54-39 Monday Night Football run

5-1 Thursday run

24-14 Sunday Night Football run (3-0 this year)

86-68-1 Prime-Time Roll since 2006

2-1 with 60 Dime plays

12-7 roll with 30 Dime plays

8-4 roll with 25 Dime plays

3-2 roll with 20 Dime plays

14-9 roll with NFL Totals releases

24-11 roll with NFL free plays

 


 

COLLEGE HOOPS SCORECARD

 

151-122-4 RUN DATING TO 2007-08

 

87-73-2 run with College Hoops Best Bets

1-0 with 40 Dime plays

4-2 with 25 Dime plays

42-23-1 run with 15 Dime plays (30-17-1 last 48)

24-11-2 run with 10 Dime plays (21-10-2 last 33)

15-10 run with 5 Dime plays

59-42-3 run with underdog releases

5-1 in the Final Four last two years

 

Back-to-Back National Championship Game Winners

Kansas over Memphis (2008)

North Carolina over Michigan State (2009)

 

Check out my spot-on analysis from Saturday's 40 Dime Value Chalk Lock of the Year winner on Washington!

 

Washington (-9) vs. Washington St.

 

This play should NOT surprise you if you’ve been following me for the last 10 days. I told you a week ago today when I backed USC as a two-point home favorite against Washington that I figured the Huskies out. You go against them when they’re on the road (now 0-6 SU and ATS) and you back them at home (13-1 SU).

 

In their last three home games, the Huskies have crushed Pac-10 foes Stanford (94-61) and Cal (84-69), easily covering in both games, and then they stepped out of conference on Tuesday and whipped Seattle 123-76. (Seattle’s no slouch, either, as the Redhawks scored road wins at Utah and at Oregon State, plus a home win over Fresno State).

 

At home, Washington State averages 86.9 points, shoots 45.2 percent from the field and has an average rebounding edge of 8.4 boards per game (37.8-29.4). By comparison, in their four Pac-10 road losses, Washington has scored 61, 61, 70 and 51 points (60.8 ppg); shot 76-for-215 from the field, good for 35.3 percent; and has a minus-25 rebounding differential! Digest those stark contrasts – I can’t remember the last time I saw home-road splits like that in college basketball!

 

Not only that, but look at Washington State’s statistics on the road: The Cougars manage just 65.2 ppg and give up 73.5 ppg, and they get outshot by an eye-popping 47.4 percent to 41.5 percent margin, including 38.8 percent to 32.9 percent from 3-point land!

 

Now, obviously, this is a rivalry game and that element has to be factored into this game. But really, there’s no comparing the talent level of Washington and Washington State. The Huskies were picked my pretty much everyone to challenge Cal for the Pac-10 title, while the Cougars were pegged for the middle of the pack (at best). And while Washington has had its struggles this year (on the road, of course), the Cougars are just 4-4 SU and 2-6 ATS in league play; in fact, they’ve failed to cover in seven of their last nine games.

 

If you take away a 65-60 home win over Oregon State (and Oregon State is easily the worst team in the league) and a 67-60 win at USC (the Trojans have no offensive firepower), here are the point totals Washington State has surrendered in its other Pac-10 games: 91, 76, 71, 93, 70 and 74. You can’t play that kind of defense and expect to hang with a Washington squad that lights up the scoreboard at home.

 

Last year, the Huskies swept the season series from Wazu, winning 68-48 on the road and 67-60 at home, and the talent gap between these rivals was much narrower than it is this year. Lay the chalk and watch Washington roll by at least 15 points!

 

RESULT: Washington 92, Washington State 64

 


 

NBA SCORECARD

 

319-261 since 2005-06 season

 

17-3 current run

(+165.5 DIMES)

 

5-2 run with 30 Dime plays

3-2 with 20 Dime plays

38-25 run with 15 Dime NBA plays (4-0 last 4)

21-10-1 run with 10 Dime NBA plays

29-20-1 run with 5 Dime NBA plays

 

3-1 with my highest-rated NBA plays of last season

 

30 DIME: Lakers over Spurs (Jan. 25) - WINNER

30 DIME: Celtics over Bulls (May 2) - WINNER

30 DIME: Lakers over Rockets (May 17) - WINNER

30 DIME: Cavs (first half) over Magic (May 28) - Loser

 


 

RATINGS SCORECARD

(All Sports)

 

2-0 run with 75 Dime plays

2-1 run with 60 Dime plays

66-52-1 run with 50 Dime plays

5-2 run with 40 Dime plays

40-34 run with 30 Dime plays

9-4 run with 25 Dime plays

23-11 run with 15 Dime plays (10-3 last 13)

5-1 run with 10 Dime plays

16-8 run with Free plays (6-1 last 6)

 


 
Jeff Benton's Rating System

My selections are rated on a 10 Dime to 100 Dime basis, usually going in 10 Dime increments.

Now, will I occasionally release something bigger than a 100 Dime play? Absolutely - if the situation warrants.

So, how does this all apply with money management basic? Good question. Read on:

No matter the sport, I play one "unit" per star rating that I release.  It is just that simple.

Now, you have to define what a unit is in relation to your personal bankroll. Perhaps one unit = one dollar. Maybe one unit = 10 cents. Whatever the case, you have to decide in order to effectively use a money management system in relation to the size of your bankroll.

Once again, you have to determine what a "unit" is worth to you. Then, using my rating system to see how strong my play is according to the dime rating.

With money management the bottom line is this. "Only wager what you can afford to lose."

 

Complimentary Selection

I missed badly on the Colts with my premium play on Sunday, but I did give you an easy 6♦ freebie winner on the Super Bowl staying UNDER the total. That’s now three straight and six of seven in the free-play department. For Monday, I’ll head back to the college hardwood and take the points with Villanova over West Virginia.

 

This is way too much of an overreaction by the oddsmakers, who have inflated this pointspread because of what happened to both these teams on Saturday (Villanova lost 103-90 at Georgetown as a two-point favorite; West Virginia routed St. John’s 79-60 as a 7½-point road chalk). But if you watched those games, you know the results were really skewed. Villanova got clocked in the jaw in the first half (trailed 50-31) before bouncing back in the second half (outscored the Hoyas 59-53 in the final 20 minutes), while the Mountaineers had one of the best second halves any team has had all year, outscoring St. John’s 57-27 after trailing by 11 points at halftime.

 

I’m really not surprised Villanova lost that game at Georgetown anyway. For one thing, the Hoyas are a tough matchup for the Wildcats, who eked out a five-point home win over the Hoyas last month. For another, Georgetown is a Top 10 team that was coming off an embarrassing home loss to South Florida. Lastly, the Wildcats were overdue for a loss. They had won 11 games in a row going into Saturday, including their first nine Big East games.

 

Yes, West Virginia (19-3) is a quality team. But unless you count Pittsburgh (70-51) as a quality team (I don’t), the Mountaineers have struggled against strong opponents, barely beating Louisville (77-74) and Ohio State (71-65) at home, while losing to Syracuse at home (72-71) and getting blown out at Purdue (77-62). Also, prior to cashing in their last two games, the Mountaineers had been in a 4-9 ATS slump (2-5 ATS at home). They’re also 4-13 ATS in their last 17 games when favored by less than seven points, while Villanova remains one of the best spread-covering teams in the nation (15-6 ATS, including 5-1 ATS in their last six on the road).

 

(based on a 1♦ to a 10♦ Rating)

 

5♦ VILLANOVA

Member Login